Choosing the best open source WYSIWYG editor isn’t as simple as picking the one with the flashiest toolbar. Developers today expect far more than bold and italic buttons. A modern editor should load quickly, support clean HTML, integrate with popular JavaScript frameworks, and allow extensive customization without locking you into expensive licensing.
- What Is a WYSIWYG Editor?
- 1. TinyMCE
- 💖 You Might Also Like
- 2. CKEditor
- 3. Tiptap Editor
- 4. Quill Editor
- 5. Lexical Editor
- 6. Editor.js
- 7. Jodit Editor
- 8. Summernote
- 9. ProseMirror
- 10. Trumbowyg
- How to Choose the Best Open Source HTML Editor
- Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the best open source WYSIWYG editor?
- Is TinyMCE open source?
- Is CKEditor free?
- Which WYSIWYG editor works with React?
- Which editor is easiest to customize?
- Which editor is best for CMS development?
- Final Thoughts
Whether you’re building a CMS, a blogging platform, a documentation site, an eCommerce store, or a SaaS application, the right open source WYSIWYG editor can save countless development hours while giving users an intuitive writing experience.
The market offers dozens of options, but they don’t all serve the same purpose. Some focus on simplicity, while others provide enterprise-grade collaboration, extensible APIs, and plugin ecosystems. That’s why this guide compares the most trusted editors developers rely on today.
In this article, you’ll learn:
- What a WYSIWYG editor is
- Why developers choose open-source editors
- How we selected the editors
- The first three editors worth considering
- Which projects each editor fits best
What Is a WYSIWYG Editor?
WYSIWYG stands for “What You See Is What You Get.”
Instead of writing raw HTML, users edit content visually. As they type, they immediately see headings, lists, tables, links, images, and formatting exactly as they’ll appear after publishing.
A free WYSIWYG editor acts as a bridge between technical HTML and user-friendly content creation.
For example, rather than typing:
<h2>Welcome</h2>
<p>This is a paragraph.</p>
A visual editor lets users simply:
- Click Heading 2
- Type text
- Press Enter
- Continue writing
The editor generates the HTML behind the scenes.
Because of this simplicity, WYSIWYG editors have become standard components in:
- Content Management Systems (CMS)
- Website builders
- Blog platforms
- Learning management systems
- Internal admin dashboards
- Documentation portals
- Customer support systems
Many modern editors also function as a powerful open source HTML editor, allowing developers to switch between visual editing and source code whenever needed.
1. TinyMCE
TinyMCE remains one of the most recognized names in the HTML WYSIWYG editor market.
It has existed for more than two decades and powers millions of editing experiences across websites, enterprise applications, and content management systems.
Although TinyMCE offers commercial plans, its open-source core remains available under the GNU GPL license.
Best For
- Enterprise CMS
- Business applications
- Publishing platforms
- Marketing websites
Key Features
- Rich toolbar customization
- Tables and advanced formatting
- Image upload support
- Media embedding
- Accessibility tools
- Spell checking
- Source code editing
- Extensive plugin ecosystem
TinyMCE also supports inline editing, making it an excellent developer-friendly editor for applications where users edit content directly on the page.
Pros
- Mature ecosystem
- Excellent documentation
- Huge plugin library
- Strong browser compatibility
- Reliable API
Cons
- Several advanced plugins require commercial licensing.
- The GPL license may not suit every commercial distribution model.
TinyMCE remains one of the strongest choices if you need a feature-rich customizable WYSIWYG editor with long-term community support.
💖 You Might Also Like
2. CKEditor
If collaboration and polished editing matter most, CKEditor deserves serious consideration.
CKEditor has evolved into one of today’s most advanced open source content editor platforms. Its latest generation emphasizes modern architecture, collaborative editing, and developer extensibility.
Like TinyMCE, CKEditor provides both open-source and commercial offerings.
Best For
- Document editing
- Team collaboration
- Enterprise software
- Knowledge bases
- Large CMS platforms
Key Features
- Real-time collaborative editing
- Track changes
- Comments
- Rich media embedding
- Paste from Microsoft Word
- Image management
- Responsive toolbar
- Plugin framework
Its modular architecture also makes it an excellent JavaScript WYSIWYG editor for custom web applications.
Pros
- Outstanding editing experience
- Excellent accessibility support
- Clean UI
- Strong API documentation
- Flexible plugin architecture
Cons
- Premium collaboration tools require paid plans.
- Configuration can feel overwhelming for small projects.
If your application resembles Google Docs more than a simple blog editor, CKEditor stands out as one of the strongest options available.
3. Tiptap Editor
Tiptap has become a favorite among modern JavaScript developers.
Unlike traditional editors, Tiptap focuses on providing an editing framework instead of a fully designed interface.
That means developers build exactly the editing experience they want.
Under the hood, Tiptap is built on ProseMirror, giving it excellent performance and flexibility.
Best For
- React applications
- Vue applications
- Modern SaaS products
- Custom CMS development
- Collaborative editors
Key Features
- Headless architecture
- Rich extension system
- Markdown support
- Collaborative editing support
- Real-time synchronization
- Custom nodes and extensions
- Framework-specific packages
Because of its architecture, Tiptap has become one of the leading choices for developers searching for a WYSIWYG editor for React or a WYSIWYG editor for Vue.
It also works well with Angular using community integrations.
Pros
- Extremely flexible
- Excellent developer experience
- Modern architecture
- Highly extensible
- Active community
Cons
- Requires more development effort than traditional editors.
- Beginners may face a steeper learning curve.
For developers who want complete control instead of a fixed interface, Tiptap offers one of the most flexible foundations available today.
4. Quill Editor
Quill has earned a strong reputation for being clean, lightweight, and easy to integrate. If you’re looking for a modern open source rich text editor JavaScript project with a simple API, Quill is hard to ignore.
Instead of overwhelming users with dozens of features, Quill focuses on delivering a fast and intuitive editing experience. It stores content using its own Delta format, which makes tracking document changes more reliable than relying solely on raw HTML.
Best For
- Blogging platforms
- Admin dashboards
- Web applications
- Internal business tools
- Educational platforms
Key Features
- Clean and minimal interface
- Customizable toolbar
- Image embedding
- Syntax highlighting
- Keyboard shortcuts
- Modular architecture
- Theme support
- Delta document model
Quill also integrates well with React, Vue, and Angular through official or community-supported packages, making it a practical JavaScript WYSIWYG editor for modern frontend projects.
Pros
- Lightweight and fast
- Easy API for developers
- Excellent documentation
- Mobile-friendly interface
- Active open-source community
Cons
- Limited built-in advanced formatting compared to enterprise editors.
- Collaborative editing requires additional implementation.
If you need a lightweight WYSIWYG editor that balances performance and simplicity, Quill remains one of the safest choices.
5. Lexical Editor
Lexical is a relatively new editor framework developed by Meta. It was designed to solve performance and extensibility challenges found in traditional rich text editors.
Instead of providing a complete editor out of the box, Lexical gives developers a flexible foundation to build custom editing experiences.
Its architecture focuses on speed, reliability, and predictable state management, making it particularly attractive for modern React applications.
Best For
- React applications
- SaaS platforms
- Collaborative editors
- Productivity software
- Custom document editors
Key Features
- High-performance rendering
- Modular plugin architecture
- Rich text formatting
- Lists and tables
- Undo and redo support
- Markdown shortcuts
- Accessibility support
- Developer-friendly API
Lexical has quickly become a preferred React open source editor because it aligns naturally with React’s component model.
Pros
- Exceptional performance
- Modern architecture
- Excellent React integration
- Highly extensible
- Active development
Cons
- React-first approach may not suit every framework.
- Smaller plugin ecosystem compared to older editors.
If you’re building a modern React application, Lexical deserves a place on your shortlist.
6. Editor.js
Editor.js takes a different approach from traditional WYSIWYG editors.
Instead of editing one continuous document, it organizes content into independent blocks. Each paragraph, heading, image, quote, checklist, or table becomes its own editable component.
This block-based model makes content easier to reuse across websites, mobile apps, and APIs.
Best For
- Headless CMS
- Content platforms
- Knowledge bases
- Documentation websites
- Structured publishing systems
Key Features
- Block-based editing
- Clean JSON output
- Plugin-based architecture
- Image upload
- Drag-and-drop block ordering
- Inline formatting
- Media embedding
- Developer-friendly API
Because it stores structured JSON instead of messy HTML, Editor.js fits perfectly into modern open source editor for CMS projects.
Pros
- Clean API
- Modern editing experience
- Flexible plugin system
- Excellent for headless applications
- Structured content output
Cons
- Not ideal when HTML output is the primary requirement.
- Requires more planning during implementation.
If your application manages structured content rather than simple articles, Editor.js offers a unique advantage over traditional editors.
7. Jodit Editor
Jodit Editor focuses on delivering a complete editing experience with minimal setup.
Many developers choose Jodit because it works immediately after installation while still allowing deep customization later.
Its compact size and straightforward configuration make it an excellent free HTML rich text editor for projects with limited development time.
Best For
- Business websites
- CMS platforms
- Admin panels
- Website builders
- Small and medium-sized applications
Key Features
- Inline editing
- Source code view
- Image upload
- File manager support
- Toolbar customization
- Responsive design
- Multiple themes
- Plugin support
Jodit also includes a built-in code view, allowing developers and advanced users to switch between visual editing and HTML editing with ease.
Pros
- Quick setup
- Easy customization
- Good performance
- Rich formatting options
- Active maintenance
Cons
- Smaller community than TinyMCE or CKEditor.
- Fewer enterprise collaboration features.
Developers looking for a dependable WYSIWYG editor with source code support often appreciate Jodit’s balance between simplicity and functionality.
8. Summernote
Summernote has been around for years and remains one of the easiest editors to integrate into traditional web applications.
Built on Bootstrap and jQuery, it continues to power many legacy CMS platforms and internal business tools.
Although newer JavaScript frameworks dominate modern development, Summernote still serves projects that rely on classic frontend stacks.
Best For
- Bootstrap websites
- Legacy applications
- Internal dashboards
- Traditional CMS platforms
- Quick prototypes
Key Features
- Drag-and-drop image upload
- Responsive toolbar
- Code view
- Media embedding
- Table support
- Keyboard shortcuts
- Simple installation
- Plugin extensions
Its familiar interface makes it an approachable browser-based WYSIWYG editor for teams maintaining existing applications.
Pros
- Easy to install
- Lightweight
- Beginner-friendly
- Bootstrap compatibility
- Simple customization
Cons
- Depends on jQuery.
- Less suitable for modern component-based frameworks.
If your project already uses Bootstrap or jQuery, Summernote remains a practical and reliable option.
9. ProseMirror
ProseMirror is more of a toolkit than a ready-to-use editor. Created by Marijn Haverbeke, it gives developers complete control over how an editor behaves, looks, and stores content.
Many modern editors – including Tiptap – build on top of ProseMirror because of its flexible document model and plugin system.
Best For
- Custom CMS platforms
- Collaborative editing
- Enterprise applications
- Advanced document editors
- Developer-focused projects
Key Features
- Custom document schema
- Powerful plugin architecture
- Collaborative editing support
- Rich text formatting
- Markdown interoperability
- Fine-grained document control
- Framework-agnostic design
Pros
- Extremely flexible
- Excellent document model
- Strong community adoption
- Reliable for complex editors
Cons
- Steeper learning curve.
- Requires significant development effort before deployment.
If your project needs complete control over document behavior, ProseMirror is one of the most capable foundations available.
10. Trumbowyg
Not every project needs a feature-packed editor. Sometimes, simplicity wins.
Trumbowyg is a lightweight open source WYSIWYG editor built for developers who want quick integration without sacrificing essential formatting tools.
Its small footprint makes it suitable for websites where page speed matters.
Best For
- Small websites
- Landing pages
- Admin dashboards
- Internal tools
- Lightweight CMS projects
Key Features
- Minimal bundle size
- Responsive toolbar
- SVG icons
- Image support
- Plugin extensions
- HTML editing mode
- Mobile-friendly interface
Pros
- Fast loading
- Easy implementation
- Clean interface
- Lightweight codebase
Cons
- Fewer advanced features than enterprise editors.
- Smaller plugin ecosystem.
If performance and simplicity rank above advanced collaboration, Trumbowyg remains a practical option.
How to Choose the Best Open Source HTML Editor
Before selecting an editor, ask yourself these questions:
- Does your application need visual editing or structured content?
- Will users collaborate in real time?
- Which frontend framework do you use?
- Do you need HTML output, Markdown, or JSON?
- Will you require image uploads or media embedding?
- Do you expect heavy customization through plugins or APIs?
- Does the editor’s open-source license fit your project?
Answering these questions will help narrow your options quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best open source WYSIWYG editor?
There isn’t a single editor that’s best for every project. TinyMCE and CKEditor excel in enterprise environments, Tiptap and Lexical suit modern JavaScript applications, while Quill offers an excellent balance of simplicity and performance.
Is TinyMCE open source?
Yes. TinyMCE provides an open-source core under the GNU General Public License (GPL). It also offers commercial plans with additional premium plugins and enterprise features.
Is CKEditor free?
Yes. CKEditor offers an open-source version under the GPL, LGPL, and MPL tri-license. Advanced collaboration features, cloud services, and some enterprise capabilities are available through paid plans.
Which WYSIWYG editor works with React?
Tiptap, Lexical, Quill, TinyMCE, CKEditor, Slate.js, and Jodit all provide React integrations or community-supported packages.
Which editor is easiest to customize?
Tiptap, ProseMirror, and Slate.js provide the greatest flexibility for developers who want to build custom editing experiences from the ground up.
Which editor is best for CMS development?
TinyMCE, CKEditor, Editor.js, and Tiptap are among the strongest choices for CMS development because they offer extensibility, plugin ecosystems, and reliable APIs.
Final Thoughts
Finding the best open source WYSIWYG editor comes down to understanding your users and your application’s architecture.
If you need a polished editor with years of proven reliability, TinyMCE and CKEditor remain excellent choices. For modern JavaScript applications, Tiptap and Lexical provide exceptional flexibility. If your project relies on structured content, Editor.js stands out with its block-based approach. Developers looking for lightweight solutions can confidently explore Quill, Jodit, or Trumbowyg.
Instead of focusing solely on feature lists, evaluate long-term maintenance, documentation quality, framework compatibility, licensing, accessibility, and community support. A well-supported editor will save time throughout your project’s lifecycle and make future upgrades much easier.
By matching the editor to your technical requirements and content workflow, you’ll build a better editing experience for both developers and end users.
Trusted Sources
The recommendations and feature comparisons in this article are based on official documentation, licensing information, and project repositories from:
TinyMCE Documentation
CKEditor Documentation
Tiptap Documentation
Quill Documentation
Lexical Documentation
Editor.js Documentation
ProseMirror Documentation
Jodit Documentation
Summernote Documentation
Trumbowyg Documentation
These official resources provide the most accurate information on features, licensing, integrations, and implementation guidance.





